A Leading Commercial Set of
Barristers in Hong Kong

The set was founded by four leading lawyers in the year 2000 in Prince’s Building. Several members were successful partners in international law firms before moving to the Bar to pursue their career in specialist advocacy.

We focus on commercial, company, technology & intellectual property and public law work. We appear before all Hong Kong civil courts and specialist forums and international and domestic arbitral tribunals. Much of our work is cross border, involving clients throughout Asia Pacific and beyond.

We work with Hong Kong law firms on Hong Kong advocacy and advice. Foreign and Greater China lawyers and clients may instruct us directly on international arbitrations within or outside Hong Kong and for Hong Kong law advice. Members are regularly appointed as commercial arbitrators and mediators by parties throughout the world.


LATEST INSIGHTS

Court of First Instance Grants Order for Bonds Investor’s Substitution as petitioner 

In In the Matter of China First Capital Group Limited [2025] HKCFI 1441, the Court of First Instance allowed substitution and amendment applications by two investors of bonds issued by China First Capital Group Limited (“Company”), Madam Yin Meng Ting and Madam Wu Guixia. Madam Yin applied to substitute as a petitioner and prosecute a […]

Participating at Vis East Moot- 30 March – 6 April 2025

Members of Prince’s Chambers were key contributors to the 22nd Willem C. Vis East International Commercial Arbitration Moot which took place in Hong Kong from 30 March to 6 April 2025.  Members Jeremy Bartlett SC, Edward Alder, Eric Ng, Lavesh Kirpalani, Thomas Yeon and Olga Boltenko had the great privilege of participating as arbitrators in […]

CIArb (East Asia Branch) Annual Dinner 2025

Prince’s Chambers and guests turned out in force for the CIArb (East Asia Branch) Annual Dinner at the Hong Kong Club on 31 March 2025. Attendees were treated to an Oxbridge style debate “This House believes that arbitrators are over-paid, underworked and overvalued”. For the motion was Jose-Antonio Maurellet SC and against was Winnie Tam […]

CONTACT US

We can be reached at the contact details below or at the email addresses and phone numbers on members’ individual CVs